Ejecución paralela de procesos de shell.

Resuelto Dirk Vollmar asked hace 15 años • 6 respuestas

¿Existe una herramienta disponible para ejecutar varios procesos en paralelo en un archivo por lotes de Windows? He encontrado algunas herramientas interesantes para Linux ( paralelo y PPSS ), sin embargo, necesitaría una herramienta para plataformas Windows.

Bonificación: sería fantástico si la herramienta también permitiera distribuir procesos de forma sencilla entre varias máquinas, ejecutando los procesos de forma remota al estilo PsExec .

Ejemplo: me gustaría que en el siguiente bucle for

for %F in (*.*) do processFile.exe %F

una cantidad limitada de instancias de ProcessFile.exe se ejecutan en paralelo para aprovechar las CPU de múltiples núcleos.

Dirk Vollmar avatar Mar 23 '09 16:03 Dirk Vollmar
Aceptado

Editar : modifiqué el script para mostrar opcionalmente el resultado de cada proceso

Aquí hay una solución por lotes nativa que ejecuta de manera confiable una lista de comandos en paralelo, sin iniciar nunca más de n procesos a la vez.

Incluso tiene un mecanismo incorporado para distribuir los procesos a CPU específicas o máquinas remotas a través de PSEXEC, pero no he probado esa característica.

El truco para que esto funcione es INICIAR cada comando a través de un proceso CMD que redirige la salida estándar o un identificador indefinido a un archivo de bloqueo. El proceso mantendrá un bloqueo exclusivo sobre el archivo hasta que finalice. No importa cómo finalice el proceso (salida normal, bloqueo, proceso finalizado), el bloqueo se liberará tan pronto como lo haga.

El script maestro puede probar si el proceso aún está activo intentando redirigir al mismo archivo de bloqueo. La redirección fallará si el proceso aún está activo y tendrá éxito si finalizó.

De forma predeterminada, el script ignora el resultado de cada proceso. Si se inicia con la /Oopción como primer parámetro, muestra la salida de cada proceso, sin entrelazar.

Mi demostración establece el límite de proceso en 4 y simplemente ejecuta una serie de comandos PING de diferente longitud.

Lo probé en XP, Vista y Windows 7.

@echo off
setlocal enableDelayedExpansion

:: Display the output of each process if the /O option is used
:: else ignore the output of each process
if /i "%~1" equ "/O" (
  set "lockHandle=1"
  set "showOutput=1"
) else (
  set "lockHandle=1^>nul 9"
  set "showOutput="
)

:: The list of commands could come from anywhere such as another file
:: or the output of another command. For this demo I will list the
:: commands within this script - Each command is prefixed with :::
::: ping /n 05 ::1
::: ping /n 20 ::1
::: ping /n 10 ::1
::: ping /n 15 ::1
::: ping /n 07 ::1
::: ping /n 05 ::1
::: ping /n 20 ::1
::: ping /n 10 ::1
::: ping /n 15 ::1
::: ping /n 07 ::1

:: Define the maximum number of parallel processes to run.
:: Each process number can optionally be assigned to a particular server
:: and/or cpu via psexec specs (untested).
set "maxProc=4"

:: Optional - Define CPU targets in terms of PSEXEC specs
::           (everything but the command)
::
:: If a CPU is not defined for a proc, then it will be run on the local machine.
:: I haven't tested this feature, but it seems like it should work.
::
:: set cpu1=psexec \\server1 ...
:: set cpu2=psexec \\server1 ...
:: set cpu3=psexec \\server2 ...
:: etc.

:: For this demo force all CPU specs to undefined (local machine)
for /l %%N in (1 1 %maxProc%) do set "cpu%%N="

:: Get a unique base lock name for this particular instantiation.
:: Incorporate a timestamp from WMIC if possible, but don't fail if
:: WMIC not available. Also incorporate a random number.
  set "lock="
  for /f "skip=1 delims=-+ " %%T in ('2^>nul wmic os get localdatetime') do (
    set "lock=%%T"
    goto :break
  )
  :break
  set "lock=%temp%\lock%lock%_%random%_"

:: Initialize the counters
  set /a "startCount=0, endCount=0"

:: Clear any existing end flags
  for /l %%N in (1 1 %maxProc%) do set "endProc%%N="

:: Launch the commands in a loop
:: Modify the IN () clause as needed to retrieve the list of commands
  set launch=1
  for /f "tokens=* delims=:" %%A in ('findstr /b ":::" "%~f0"') do (
    if !startCount! lss %maxProc% (
      set /a "startCount+=1, nextProc=startCount"
    ) else (
      call :wait
    )
    set cmd!nextProc!=%%A
    if defined showOutput echo -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    echo !time! - proc!nextProc!: starting %%A
    2>nul del %lock%!nextProc!
    %= Redirect the lock handle to the lock file. The CMD process will     =%
    %= maintain an exclusive lock on the lock file until the process ends. =%
    start /b "" cmd /c %lockHandle%^>"%lock%!nextProc!" 2^>^&1 !cpu%%N! %%A
  )
  set "launch="

:wait
:: Wait for procs to finish in a loop
:: If still launching then return as soon as a proc ends
:: else wait for all procs to finish
  :: redirect stderr to null to suppress any error message if redirection
  :: within the loop fails.
  for /l %%N in (1 1 %startCount%) do 2>nul (
    %= Redirect an unused file handle to the lock file. If the process is    =%
    %= still running then redirection will fail and the IF body will not run =%
    if not defined endProc%%N if exist "%lock%%%N" 9>>"%lock%%%N" (
      %= Made it inside the IF body so the process must have finished =%
      if defined showOutput echo ===============================================================================
      echo !time! - proc%%N: finished !cmd%%N!
      if defined showOutput type "%lock%%%N"
      if defined launch (
        set nextProc=%%N
        exit /b
      )
      set /a "endCount+=1, endProc%%N=1"
    )
  )
  if %endCount% lss %startCount% (
    1>nul 2>nul ping /n 2 ::1
    goto :wait
  )

2>nul del %lock%*
if defined showOutput echo ===============================================================================
echo Thats all folks^^!

Aquí se muestra el resultado de una ejecución de muestra que ignora el resultado del proceso.

12:24:07.52 - proc1: starting  ping /n 05 ::1
12:24:07.52 - proc2: starting  ping /n 20 ::1
12:24:07.53 - proc3: starting  ping /n 10 ::1
12:24:07.54 - proc4: starting  ping /n 15 ::1
12:24:11.60 - proc1: finished  ping /n 05 ::1
12:24:11.60 - proc1: starting  ping /n 07 ::1
12:24:16.66 - proc3: finished  ping /n 10 ::1
12:24:16.66 - proc3: starting  ping /n 05 ::1
12:24:17.68 - proc1: finished  ping /n 07 ::1
12:24:17.68 - proc1: starting  ping /n 20 ::1
12:24:20.72 - proc3: finished  ping /n 05 ::1
12:24:20.72 - proc3: starting  ping /n 10 ::1
12:24:21.75 - proc4: finished  ping /n 15 ::1
12:24:21.75 - proc4: starting  ping /n 15 ::1
12:24:26.82 - proc2: finished  ping /n 20 ::1
12:24:26.82 - proc2: starting  ping /n 07 ::1
12:24:29.86 - proc3: finished  ping /n 10 ::1
12:24:32.89 - proc2: finished  ping /n 07 ::1
12:24:35.92 - proc4: finished  ping /n 15 ::1
12:24:36.93 - proc1: finished  ping /n 20 ::1
Thats all folks!

Aquí está el resultado si se ejecuta con la /Oopción que muestra el resultado del proceso.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12:24:51.02 - proc1: starting  ping /n 05 ::1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12:24:51.02 - proc2: starting  ping /n 20 ::1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12:24:51.03 - proc3: starting  ping /n 10 ::1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12:24:51.04 - proc4: starting  ping /n 15 ::1
===============================================================================
12:24:55.10 - proc1: finished  ping /n 05 ::1

Pinging ::1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Ping statistics for ::1:
    Packets: Sent = 5, Received = 5, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12:24:55.10 - proc1: starting  ping /n 07 ::1
===============================================================================
12:25:00.17 - proc3: finished  ping /n 10 ::1

Pinging ::1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Ping statistics for ::1:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12:25:00.19 - proc3: starting  ping /n 05 ::1
===============================================================================
12:25:01.22 - proc1: finished  ping /n 07 ::1

Pinging ::1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Ping statistics for ::1:
    Packets: Sent = 7, Received = 7, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12:25:01.23 - proc1: starting  ping /n 20 ::1
===============================================================================
12:25:04.27 - proc3: finished  ping /n 05 ::1

Pinging ::1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Ping statistics for ::1:
    Packets: Sent = 5, Received = 5, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12:25:04.28 - proc3: starting  ping /n 10 ::1
===============================================================================
12:25:05.30 - proc4: finished  ping /n 15 ::1

Pinging ::1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Ping statistics for ::1:
    Packets: Sent = 15, Received = 15, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12:25:05.32 - proc4: starting  ping /n 15 ::1
===============================================================================
12:25:10.38 - proc2: finished  ping /n 20 ::1

Pinging ::1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Ping statistics for ::1:
    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12:25:10.40 - proc2: starting  ping /n 07 ::1
===============================================================================
12:25:13.44 - proc3: finished  ping /n 10 ::1

Pinging ::1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Ping statistics for ::1:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
===============================================================================
12:25:16.48 - proc2: finished  ping /n 07 ::1

Pinging ::1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Ping statistics for ::1:
    Packets: Sent = 7, Received = 7, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
===============================================================================
12:25:19.52 - proc4: finished  ping /n 15 ::1

Pinging ::1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Ping statistics for ::1:
    Packets: Sent = 15, Received = 15, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
===============================================================================
12:25:20.54 - proc1: finished  ping /n 20 ::1

Pinging ::1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Ping statistics for ::1:
    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
===============================================================================
Thats all folks!
dbenham avatar Jul 30 '2012 04:07 dbenham

Prueba el startcomando :

start "title of the process" "P:\ath\to.exe"

Abre una nueva ventana con el título indicado y ejecuta el archivo BAT, CMD o EXE. También puede establecer la prioridad, configurar el mismo entorno, etc.

Los archivos que no son ejecutables se abren con el programa asociado.

Lectura adicional: Inicio -> Ejecutar

cmd /k start /?

Start está disponible al menos desde WinME.

¡Buena suerte!

guerda avatar Mar 24 '2009 09:03 guerda

Suena más como si quisieras usar Powershell 2. Sin embargo, puedes generar nuevas cmdventanas (u otros procesos) usando start, consulta también esta respuesta. Aunque probablemente tengas que usar otras herramientas y algunos trucos para crear algo así como un "grupo de procesos" (para tener sólo un máximo de n instancias ejecutándose a la vez). Puede lograr esto último usando tasklist /imy contando cuántos ya hay ( forbucle o wc, si corresponde) y simplemente espere ( ping -n 2 ::1 >nul 2>&1) y vuelva a verificar si puede generar un nuevo proceso.

He preparado un pequeño lote de prueba para esto:

@echo off
for /l %%i in (1,1,20) do call :loop %%i
goto :eof

:loop
call :checkinstances
if %INSTANCES% LSS 5 (
    rem just a dummy program that waits instead of doing useful stuff
    rem but suffices for now
    echo Starting processing instance for %1
    start /min wait.exe 5 sec
    goto :eof
)
rem wait a second, can be adjusted with -w (-n 2 because the first ping returns immediately;
rem otherwise just use an address that's unused and -n 1)
echo Waiting for instances to close ...
ping -n 2 ::1 >nul 2>&1
rem jump back to see whether we can spawn a new process now
goto loop
goto :eof

:checkinstances
rem this could probably be done better. But INSTANCES should contain the number of running instances afterwards.
for /f "usebackq" %%t in (`tasklist /fo csv /fi "imagename eq wait.exe"^|find /c /v ""`) do set INSTANCES=%%t
goto :eof

Genera un máximo de cuatro nuevos procesos que se ejecutan en paralelo y minimizados. El tiempo de espera probablemente deba ajustarse, dependiendo de cuánto haga cada proceso y cuánto tiempo esté ejecutándose. Probablemente también necesites ajustar el nombre del proceso que busca la lista de tareas si estás haciendo otra cosa.

Sin embargo, no hay forma de contar correctamente los procesos generados por este lote. Una forma sería crear un número aleatorio al inicio del lote ( %RANDOM%) y crear un lote auxiliar que realice el procesamiento (o genere el programa de procesamiento) pero que pueda establecer el título de su ventana en un parámetro:

@echo off
title %1
"%2" "%3"

Este sería un lote simple que establece su título en el primer parámetro y luego ejecuta el segundo parámetro con el tercero como argumento. Luego puede filtrar en la lista de tareas seleccionando solo los procesos con el título de ventana especificado ( tasklist /fi "windowtitle eq ..."). Esto debería funcionar de manera bastante confiable y evitar demasiados falsos positivos. Buscar cmd.exesería una mala idea si todavía tiene algunas instancias en ejecución, ya que eso limita su grupo de procesos de trabajo.

Puede usarlo %NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS%para crear un valor predeterminado sensato de cuántas instancias generar.

También puede adaptar esto fácilmente para psexecgenerar los procesos de forma remota (pero no sería muy viable ya que debe tener privilegios de administrador en la otra máquina y proporcionar la contraseña en el lote). Sin embargo, entonces tendrías que usar nombres de procesos para filtrar.

Joey avatar Mar 24 '2009 09:03 Joey

Hay un clon básico tipo xargs de Windows que admite la opción de procesamiento paralelo -P en http://www.pirosa.co.uk/demo/wxargs/wxargs.html

PP. avatar Aug 20 '2012 16:08 PP.